MADE IN PAKISTAN....

I was just going through the evidence dossier that India has given to Pakistan (http://www.hindu.com/nic/dossier.htm) to urge it to speed up it’s investigation process, if any, and hand over the guilty to us. In the second annexure of the first section of the dossier were the list of evidences that were recovered from Kasab and their pics. One thing that was striking there was that all the products recovered from that guy… I mean all… were “made in Pakistan” u could just check out the dossier yourself and you would know what I am talking about. Bermuda, spray paints, shaving cream, brushes, tissue paper.. everything. .”made in Pakistan”. Get the forensics..do a DNA test.. mayb even that would have a “made in Pakistan” tag on it somewhere. (that wud be SOME evidence!) I guess they wud never be able to catch an Indian terrorist in that case, cos we always have products that say, “made in China” or “made in USA”.  ppl wud have a tuf time framing our guys if they try looking for such evidences!! Everything would then direct to the USA or China.. or if it’s a low esteemed terrorist.. maybe Bangladesh! We hardly use “made in India” stuff man! It’s pathetic.. but kinda true. C’mon what does ur shirt say now?? At least these terrorists are patriotic in that sense.. ..
But there is one thing that strikes me with all this investigation that is going and that is… if at all the ISI was involved in the Mumbai attacks, would they have not taken care of such petty things as asking their guys to use other stuff and conceal their identities?? After all they are the “inter services intelligence”!! we know they have the intelligence to do a lotta stuff!!!.... wudn they have the intelligence to take care of such petty things? India, with all the evidences gathered is sure that the terrorists were Pakistanis and maybe even the ISI had a role to play. But then we haven’t done much about it yet. It took our ppl more than a month to hold a conference of chief ministers on internal security… the anti-terror laws that are passed are already being vigorously opposed by ppl like Narendra Modi (wr the fuk is Karan Thapar??), certain NGO’s seem to be voicing concerns over Kasab and there have been a whole lot of talks that have gone in between our ministers and several other “mediating”countries. Yet, not one productive result.. yet! Diplomatic stances have been taken and investigation has also been conducted by several foreign bodies mainly bcos there is atleast one person in the annexure of the dossier who happens to be that country’s national and was a victim of the attack. Our PM, yday, has finally come up with some strong words and pointed directly at our neighbour accusing it of using terrorism as an instrument od state policy. That sounded positive intent.. just hope that he backs it up with some action.
But one still wonders, should it really be so difficult to bring the perpetrators to justice when we have all the evidences gathered. Apparently, rolling stones have started to gather a whole lot of moss these days!!! It’s funny ‘cos back in the day, I had heard they don’t.
I don’t remember America haven done so much talking after the 9/11 attacks as they seem to be doing here in our case. Pakistan says that it doesn’t have extradition treaties with India as it does with America and so it cannot hand over the terrorists wanted by India!! I do not think terrorists belong to any nation.. they are just fukn terrorists who ain’t belong to shit! I fail to understand y Pakistan is in love with these people and is trying to protect them by maintaining such fukd up diplomatic stances on the face of such a global threat. If she has control over these people, as it claims to, then why not just hand them over to the people who have been victimized by their heinous acts. Perpetrators of peace and international relations need not be taken care of as if they were responsible citizens of a particular nation. Ok.. mayb.. Zakiur Rahman Lakhvi wears stuff that are “made in Pakistan” and drinks milk packaged in Pakistan, but does that mean that she should defend him as if he were a prized possession of the nation.. or is he??